PLEASE CLICK THIS LINK FOR DETAIL.
http://www.amucontrollerexams.com
MUSHEER AHMAD KHAN
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Role of madrasas in the 1857 War of Independence

More than half a million Muslim clerics sacrificed their lives for India during the various phases of the great 1857 revolt - a fact almost buried like the mutineers themselves. These Indian freedom fighters came from the same madrasas that have been under scanner all over the world since 9/11.
In 1997, I was witness as well as part of the grand celebration of India's completion of 50 years of independence. Not one word was mentioned during that event about the role of the ulema and the madrasas in the battle against the English. It was hurting. Celebrated Punjabi litterateur Kartar Singh Duggal says in his autobiography that the Indian maulvis were one with the pandits on the issue of retaining the age-old Indian traditions - both Vedic and Islamic.
Relates Maulana Umar Gautam of Madrasa Markaz-ul-Ma'arif that madrasas are a legacy of the Mughal rule when these "institutions of higher learning" were set up to promote both religious and scientific knowledge. In the 1857 Sepoy Mutiny, as the English call it, the madrasas had become hubs of nationalism and had to bear the wrath of the British.
The madrasas remained the hub of the anti-British movement even later.
It is to the credit of the Deoband Madrasa that an Indian government in exile was formed in Kabul on July 9, 1916 after Maulana Obaidullah Sindhi was sent there on a special mission. Maharaja Pratap Singh was the government's "president" and Sheikh-ul-Hind Maulana Mehmood-ul-Hasan the "prime minister". Maulana Barkatullah Bhopali and Maulana Obaidullah Sindhi were its ministers.
According to the account of Dilli Urdu Akhbar, 222 ulema were arrested including Sheikh-ul-Islam Maulana Hussain Ahmed Madani, Maulana Waheed Ahmed Faizabadi, Maulana Aziz Gul and Hakeem Sayeed Nusrat Hussain. They were sent to Malta via Cairo by a ship Feb 21, 1917 and released June 8, 1920. There were many who were there for the whole of their life.
Members of the Khilafat Committee issued a favour supporting the non-cooperation movement in July 1920. The fatwa, published in the Aljamiaat Urdu daily of Delhi, was signed by 500 ulema declaring the British government as 'haraam' (prohibited by the Sharia). This implored the Hindus to start the Shuddhikaran movement to oppose the English.
The service rendered by madrasas to the country and the Muslim community is an established fact. In India, these madrasas have played an important role in protecting human, Islamic and social values. These institutes have also played an important role in survival of Islamic practices -- dissemination, publication of Islamic literature, protection of Islamic faith and development of Islamic culture and civilization besides contributing in the development of the country.
According to Maulana Azad's Al-Hilal, Hazrat Alif Mujaddid Sani, Maulana Ajmal Khan, Maulana Syed Ataullah Shah Bukhari, Allama Anwar Shah Kashmiri, Ashfaqullah Khan Kakorvi, Maulana Imam Bakhsh Suhbai, Maulana Hasrat Mohani and Shah Abdur Rahim Raipuri were all madrasa products who fought the English tooth and nail.
Who can forget the sacrifice of Bahadur Shah Zafar, who became the symbol of Hindu-Muslim concord? Can one forget Muslim women like Chand Bibi, Begum Hazrat Mahal and Begum Zeenat Mahal who rather than being raped at the hands of the English went down fighting the English?
The first and foremost entity to foresee British plans to enslave India was a product of these very Islamic madrasas - Shah Waliullah Muhaddis Dehlawi. He was a great saint as well!
States the Savera Urdu monthly of Lahore that Shah Waliullah Muhaddis Dehlawi saw the destruction of country with his own eyes. He deeply studied the conditions prevailing in Europe and Asia and laid down certain reformative ideas for future government with a view to banishing the British from India.
He started a movement for this and made madrasas the centers of national movement. In 1731, the plan for the country's freedom was prepared under the leadership of Shah Sahab and ulema like Shah Abdul Aziz and Shah Rafiuddin.
The true heir of Shah Saheb's legacy and his ideas, the Imam-e-Hurriat, Shah Abdul Aziz Muhaddis Dehlawi, raised the banner of revolt against the British and gave a fatwa that the country had been enslaved and it was the duty of everyone to undertake jehad for freedom.
After this declaration of jehad by the Imam-e-Hurriat, the scholars of religious madrasas made the freedom of the country the mission of their life. From 1818 to 1831, under the leadership of Syed Ahmad Shahid Barelwi, who was brought up by Shah Abdul Aziz Muhaddis Dehlawi, a group of ulema toured the entire country extensively.
In 1831, while fighting the British at Balakot, leader of the Hurriat Caravan, Syed Ahmad Shahid, and his true follower, Ismail Shaheed, laid down their lives and attained martyrdom.
Their deaths turned the freedom wave into a storm.
In 1997, I was witness as well as part of the grand celebration of India's completion of 50 years of independence. Not one word was mentioned during that event about the role of the ulema and the madrasas in the battle against the English. It was hurting. Celebrated Punjabi litterateur Kartar Singh Duggal says in his autobiography that the Indian maulvis were one with the pandits on the issue of retaining the age-old Indian traditions - both Vedic and Islamic.
Relates Maulana Umar Gautam of Madrasa Markaz-ul-Ma'arif that madrasas are a legacy of the Mughal rule when these "institutions of higher learning" were set up to promote both religious and scientific knowledge. In the 1857 Sepoy Mutiny, as the English call it, the madrasas had become hubs of nationalism and had to bear the wrath of the British.
The madrasas remained the hub of the anti-British movement even later.
It is to the credit of the Deoband Madrasa that an Indian government in exile was formed in Kabul on July 9, 1916 after Maulana Obaidullah Sindhi was sent there on a special mission. Maharaja Pratap Singh was the government's "president" and Sheikh-ul-Hind Maulana Mehmood-ul-Hasan the "prime minister". Maulana Barkatullah Bhopali and Maulana Obaidullah Sindhi were its ministers.
According to the account of Dilli Urdu Akhbar, 222 ulema were arrested including Sheikh-ul-Islam Maulana Hussain Ahmed Madani, Maulana Waheed Ahmed Faizabadi, Maulana Aziz Gul and Hakeem Sayeed Nusrat Hussain. They were sent to Malta via Cairo by a ship Feb 21, 1917 and released June 8, 1920. There were many who were there for the whole of their life.
Members of the Khilafat Committee issued a favour supporting the non-cooperation movement in July 1920. The fatwa, published in the Aljamiaat Urdu daily of Delhi, was signed by 500 ulema declaring the British government as 'haraam' (prohibited by the Sharia). This implored the Hindus to start the Shuddhikaran movement to oppose the English.
The service rendered by madrasas to the country and the Muslim community is an established fact. In India, these madrasas have played an important role in protecting human, Islamic and social values. These institutes have also played an important role in survival of Islamic practices -- dissemination, publication of Islamic literature, protection of Islamic faith and development of Islamic culture and civilization besides contributing in the development of the country.
According to Maulana Azad's Al-Hilal, Hazrat Alif Mujaddid Sani, Maulana Ajmal Khan, Maulana Syed Ataullah Shah Bukhari, Allama Anwar Shah Kashmiri, Ashfaqullah Khan Kakorvi, Maulana Imam Bakhsh Suhbai, Maulana Hasrat Mohani and Shah Abdur Rahim Raipuri were all madrasa products who fought the English tooth and nail.
Who can forget the sacrifice of Bahadur Shah Zafar, who became the symbol of Hindu-Muslim concord? Can one forget Muslim women like Chand Bibi, Begum Hazrat Mahal and Begum Zeenat Mahal who rather than being raped at the hands of the English went down fighting the English?
The first and foremost entity to foresee British plans to enslave India was a product of these very Islamic madrasas - Shah Waliullah Muhaddis Dehlawi. He was a great saint as well!
States the Savera Urdu monthly of Lahore that Shah Waliullah Muhaddis Dehlawi saw the destruction of country with his own eyes. He deeply studied the conditions prevailing in Europe and Asia and laid down certain reformative ideas for future government with a view to banishing the British from India.
He started a movement for this and made madrasas the centers of national movement. In 1731, the plan for the country's freedom was prepared under the leadership of Shah Sahab and ulema like Shah Abdul Aziz and Shah Rafiuddin.
The true heir of Shah Saheb's legacy and his ideas, the Imam-e-Hurriat, Shah Abdul Aziz Muhaddis Dehlawi, raised the banner of revolt against the British and gave a fatwa that the country had been enslaved and it was the duty of everyone to undertake jehad for freedom.
After this declaration of jehad by the Imam-e-Hurriat, the scholars of religious madrasas made the freedom of the country the mission of their life. From 1818 to 1831, under the leadership of Syed Ahmad Shahid Barelwi, who was brought up by Shah Abdul Aziz Muhaddis Dehlawi, a group of ulema toured the entire country extensively.
In 1831, while fighting the British at Balakot, leader of the Hurriat Caravan, Syed Ahmad Shahid, and his true follower, Ismail Shaheed, laid down their lives and attained martyrdom.
Their deaths turned the freedom wave into a storm.
Monday, January 4, 2010
NASKCON 2010

The Department of Library and Information Science, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh (UP)
Organizes National Seminar on
Knowledge Conservation and Preservation (NASKCON 2010)
March 13 & 14, 2010.
Theme: Knowledge Conservation and Preservation (NASKCON 2010)
Sub -Themes:
Preservation and Conservation of
· Scientific Publications
· Electronic Theses and Dissertations
· Educational Resources (Open Courseware)
· Multimedia resources
· Problems and Role of Govt. and NGO's in Preservation
· Knowledge Engineering
· Knowledge Management
· Copyright Issues in Knowledge Preservation
· Problems in Conservation of Cultural Heritage in Museums, Archives and Libraries
· The Awareness of Conservation and Reasons for Re-Orientation of Library Training.
Venue: Department of Library and Information Science, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, UP-202002
Date: 13 & 14, March 2010.
Last date for submission of papers: 31-01-2010
Further Details follows…………..
Contact Persons:
Dr. Naushad Ali P.M
Convener, NASKCON 2010
Dept. of Library and Information Science
Aligarh Muslim University
Aligarh (UP)
Tel: 0571-2700039/098972-58855
E-mail: naskcon2010@gmail.com
Dr. Sudharma Haridasan
Organizing Secretary, NASKCON 2010
Dept. of Library and Information Science
Aligarh Muslim University
Aligarh (UP)
Tel: 09412272298
E-mail: naskcon2010@gmail.com
Organizes National Seminar on
Knowledge Conservation and Preservation (NASKCON 2010)
March 13 & 14, 2010.
Theme: Knowledge Conservation and Preservation (NASKCON 2010)
Sub -Themes:
Preservation and Conservation of
· Scientific Publications
· Electronic Theses and Dissertations
· Educational Resources (Open Courseware)
· Multimedia resources
· Problems and Role of Govt. and NGO's in Preservation
· Knowledge Engineering
· Knowledge Management
· Copyright Issues in Knowledge Preservation
· Problems in Conservation of Cultural Heritage in Museums, Archives and Libraries
· The Awareness of Conservation and Reasons for Re-Orientation of Library Training.
Venue: Department of Library and Information Science, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, UP-202002
Date: 13 & 14, March 2010.
Last date for submission of papers: 31-01-2010
Further Details follows…………..
Contact Persons:
Dr. Naushad Ali P.M
Convener, NASKCON 2010
Dept. of Library and Information Science
Aligarh Muslim University
Aligarh (UP)
Tel: 0571-2700039/098972-58855
E-mail: naskcon2010@gmail.com
Dr. Sudharma Haridasan
Organizing Secretary, NASKCON 2010
Dept. of Library and Information Science
Aligarh Muslim University
Aligarh (UP)
Tel: 09412272298
E-mail: naskcon2010@gmail.com
Thursday, December 31, 2009
RANGANATHAN MISHRA REPORT
Senior journalist Santosh Bhartiya's hard-hitting articles in his weekly newspaper Chauthi Duniya kicked up a storm and some Members of Parliament [MPs] got so agitated that they succeeded in getting a privilege notice issued against him. The RS members--Ali Anwar, Sabir Ali, R Prasad and Aziz Pasha--were angry with the writer for using words like 'napunsak' [impotent] and 'shakti-vihin' [powerless] among others. But the result of the reports published in consecutive issues of the newspaper was that the MPs who generally remain silent, had to speak up and the government that had kept the Ranganathan Mishra panel report under wraps for years, had to announce that it would be tabled in the current session of parliament. Two years back, former Chief Justice Ranganathan Mishra had submitted this report on the status of religious and cultural minorities in the country but it was swept under the carpet. The report states that non-inclusion of Christian and Muslim Dalits in the category of Scheduled Castes that are entitled to job reservations, tantamounts to religious discrimination which is against he spirit of constitution. However, the stinging series of articles led to ruckus in Rajya Sabha and PM Manmohan Singh had to accept the demand to table it. It is noteworthy that Twocircles.net had already published the entire report.
MOST INFLUENTIAL MUSLIMS IN WORLD

The list of 500 most influential Muslims in the world had hit headlines in India due to the names of some celebrities. Though such lists shouldn't be taken too seriously, still, they do evoke interest. Many of these influential persons include monarchs and sheikhs of middle-east apart from heads of religious organisations and sects. Some of them haven't made much impact on public consciousness across the globe but have influence in their own countries and territories.However, like most lists that draw criticism and commendation at the same time, the Georgetown University's selection comprises a number of Muslim scholars, professionals, thinkers, doctors, experts in various fields et al.
Importantly, the highest number of Muslims included in the list are from United States of Ameria [71] followed by Britain [32]. The countries together make for over 100 personalities. And this is the positive aspect of the listing. The rankings are only for the top 50.Of the 10 Indians in the list the head of the Dawoodi Bohra communit Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin, former President Abdul Kalam, Islamic scholar Wahiduddin Khan and preacher Zakir Naik are the notable ones.The names of Shahrukh Khan and AR Rahman, who have also been included in the list, were splashed in papers because of their celebrity status. Others are Maulana Mahmood Madani, Asghar Ali Engineer, Syed Ameen Miyan Qadri and Ahmad Sheikh Abu Bakr.
There are 16 persons from Pakistan including Abdus Sattar Eidhi. Even Bilawal Zardari has found a place. The list has Muslims from almost every country ranging from Canada to New Zealand. Countries that make up for most personalities in the list inlude Iran 25, Saudi Arabia 24, Egypt 23, Turkey 20, Indonesia 15, South Africa 12, Morocco 11, Iraq 11, Jordan 10, Lebanon 10, Palestine 10 and France 5. Rest of the countries have less than five persons each in the list.
There are biographies of the personalities making it to the top 50. All the 500 persons have been categorised as scholarly, administrative, political, preachers, women, lineage, youth, philanthropy, art & culture, media and even radicals. There are around 45 women. Though one can name many other individuals that have greater impact, the 2009 edition of the list, which is the first, and would become an annual feature, seems to be an interesting exercise.
Importantly, the highest number of Muslims included in the list are from United States of Ameria [71] followed by Britain [32]. The countries together make for over 100 personalities. And this is the positive aspect of the listing. The rankings are only for the top 50.Of the 10 Indians in the list the head of the Dawoodi Bohra communit Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin, former President Abdul Kalam, Islamic scholar Wahiduddin Khan and preacher Zakir Naik are the notable ones.The names of Shahrukh Khan and AR Rahman, who have also been included in the list, were splashed in papers because of their celebrity status. Others are Maulana Mahmood Madani, Asghar Ali Engineer, Syed Ameen Miyan Qadri and Ahmad Sheikh Abu Bakr.
There are 16 persons from Pakistan including Abdus Sattar Eidhi. Even Bilawal Zardari has found a place. The list has Muslims from almost every country ranging from Canada to New Zealand. Countries that make up for most personalities in the list inlude Iran 25, Saudi Arabia 24, Egypt 23, Turkey 20, Indonesia 15, South Africa 12, Morocco 11, Iraq 11, Jordan 10, Lebanon 10, Palestine 10 and France 5. Rest of the countries have less than five persons each in the list.
There are biographies of the personalities making it to the top 50. All the 500 persons have been categorised as scholarly, administrative, political, preachers, women, lineage, youth, philanthropy, art & culture, media and even radicals. There are around 45 women. Though one can name many other individuals that have greater impact, the 2009 edition of the list, which is the first, and would become an annual feature, seems to be an interesting exercise.
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
JASWANT SINGH'S EPULSION FROM BJP

Expulsion of Jaswant Singh from BJP shows that how much we have became intolerable toward different and difficult views.A society progress with debate ,conflict ,different views not with just uniformity of opinions .Jaswant Singh has the whole right to express his opinion ,he never says that this is his party's views .So BJP must not take the decision to expel him.This is like that no one can criticise no one -the true autocratic situation. In congress you can't criticise Nehru- Gandhi family, in BJP you can't praise Jinnah,or senior leadership.Just accept everything as it is.If this is the situation then where is democracy.J L Nehru himself said that in democracy one must have the ability to tolerate opponent's view, which we are loosing very fastly and in its place CHAMCHAGIRI is becoming very popular.Media should also not blow this out of propotion.Different views of a person is very important for the development of mind ,one must try to think at a subject from different angles.Anybody in politics is for power purpose not for charity purpose either it be Jinnah or J L Nehru. No one is holy cow but we must try to look at them from different angles not in a black-white manner.Jinnah may be the symbol of Hindu-Muslim unity but he was also the person who demanded for Pakistan- a separate nation for muslims. What might be the reasons for which Nehru agreed to have partition and at the same time promised that muslims in India will remain safe.This shows the complexity of human beings's complex decision making nature and admiration for power.This must be look in a different manner. And I think Jaswant Singh only tried to do that.He should not be expelled at least for expressing his views.You may agree with him or you may not.About his view on Patel many people may not vouch for his idea but at least can hear it for sake of hearing
ISHRAT JAHAN FAKE ENCOUNTER

In yet another major setback to the Narendra Modi government in Gujarat, Ahmedabad metropolitan magistrate S.P. Tamang, has ruled that the incident in which Ishrat Jahan and three others were killed in June, 2004, was yet another case of “fake encounter.”
In his 243-page hand written report on the encounter, Mr. Tamang has named the then “encounter specialist” of the Gujarat police, D.G. Vanzara, and others as accused in the “cold blooded murder” of the teenaged girl and three others.
Mr. Vanzara and several other policemen are already in jail in connection with the Sohrabuddin case which the State government confessed before the Supreme Court was a case of “fake encounter.”
A special three-member team of top police officers of the State appointed by the Gujarat High Court for a fresh investigation into the Ishrat Jahan encounter is seized of the matter.
Claiming that Ishrat and three others were killed in fake encounter by the police officers for their personal interests, get promotions and gain appreciations from the Chief Minister, Mr Tamang appended a list of top police officers running into about two pages who he held responsible for the fake encounter. Besides Mr Vanzara and his then deputy in the Crime Branch police, N. K. Amin, who along with Mr Vanzara was also arrested in the Sohrabuddin fake encounter case, the list includes the then Ahmedabad police commissioner, K. R. Kaushik, the then chief of the Crime Branch, P. P. Pandey, another alleged encounter specialist Tarun Barot and a host of other senior police officers.
Mr Tamang’s report said the Crime Branch police “kidnapped” Ishrat and three others from Mumbai on June 12 and brought them to Ahmedabad. The four were killed on the night of June 14 in police custody, but the police claimed that an “encounter” took place on the morning of June 15 near Kotarpur water works on the outskirts of Ahmedabad. The rigor mortis that had set in clearly indicated that Ishrat died between 11 p.m. and 12 midnight the previous night and the police apparently pumped bullets into her body to substantiate the encounter theory.
It said the explosives, rifles, and other weapons allegedly found in their car were all “planted” by the police after the encounter.
The police had then claimed that Ishrat, a resident of Mumbra near Mumbai, and three others — Javed Sheikh, a convert son of Gopinath Pillai of Kerala and two Pakistani citizens Amzad Ali Rana and Jishan Jauhar — were connected with Pakistan-based terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba, and were coming to Gujarat to assassinate Mr. Modi to avenge the 2002 communal riots.
In his 243-page hand written report on the encounter, Mr. Tamang has named the then “encounter specialist” of the Gujarat police, D.G. Vanzara, and others as accused in the “cold blooded murder” of the teenaged girl and three others.
Mr. Vanzara and several other policemen are already in jail in connection with the Sohrabuddin case which the State government confessed before the Supreme Court was a case of “fake encounter.”
A special three-member team of top police officers of the State appointed by the Gujarat High Court for a fresh investigation into the Ishrat Jahan encounter is seized of the matter.
Claiming that Ishrat and three others were killed in fake encounter by the police officers for their personal interests, get promotions and gain appreciations from the Chief Minister, Mr Tamang appended a list of top police officers running into about two pages who he held responsible for the fake encounter. Besides Mr Vanzara and his then deputy in the Crime Branch police, N. K. Amin, who along with Mr Vanzara was also arrested in the Sohrabuddin fake encounter case, the list includes the then Ahmedabad police commissioner, K. R. Kaushik, the then chief of the Crime Branch, P. P. Pandey, another alleged encounter specialist Tarun Barot and a host of other senior police officers.
Mr Tamang’s report said the Crime Branch police “kidnapped” Ishrat and three others from Mumbai on June 12 and brought them to Ahmedabad. The four were killed on the night of June 14 in police custody, but the police claimed that an “encounter” took place on the morning of June 15 near Kotarpur water works on the outskirts of Ahmedabad. The rigor mortis that had set in clearly indicated that Ishrat died between 11 p.m. and 12 midnight the previous night and the police apparently pumped bullets into her body to substantiate the encounter theory.
It said the explosives, rifles, and other weapons allegedly found in their car were all “planted” by the police after the encounter.
The police had then claimed that Ishrat, a resident of Mumbra near Mumbai, and three others — Javed Sheikh, a convert son of Gopinath Pillai of Kerala and two Pakistani citizens Amzad Ali Rana and Jishan Jauhar — were connected with Pakistan-based terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba, and were coming to Gujarat to assassinate Mr. Modi to avenge the 2002 communal riots.
Friday, June 19, 2009
kaun kahta hai
KAUN KAHTA HAI ZAMANE KI KHABAR RAKHTI HAI,
GARDISH E WAQT TO BAS MUJHPE NAZAR RAKHTI HAI,
MERE PAIRON KI THAKAN ROOTH NA JAANA MUJHSE,
EK TU HI TO MERA RAAZ E SAFAR RAKHTI HAI....... "...................................................................................................................................................................................................
GARDISH E WAQT TO BAS MUJHPE NAZAR RAKHTI HAI,
MERE PAIRON KI THAKAN ROOTH NA JAANA MUJHSE,
EK TU HI TO MERA RAAZ E SAFAR RAKHTI HAI....... "...................................................................................................................................................................................................
sakht
sakht rahon m jo aasan safar lagta hai...
ye meri man ki duaaon ka asar lagta hai....
"Zalzale unche makanon ko hila dete hain..
.main to buniyad ka patthar hun mujhe khauf nahin...
"Hai ahtiyat munasib ghalat bayani se...
sawal achcha na ho to jawab mat dena...."
tadbeer se banaiye maiyare zndagi..
maahaul se hayat ka sauda na kijiye...
"muflisi ka hamne apni kuch is tarah rakha bharam..
.waste kam ker diye maghroor kehlane lage..."RAKHTI HAI....... "...................................................................................................................................................................................................
ye meri man ki duaaon ka asar lagta hai....
"Zalzale unche makanon ko hila dete hain..
.main to buniyad ka patthar hun mujhe khauf nahin...
"Hai ahtiyat munasib ghalat bayani se...
sawal achcha na ho to jawab mat dena...."
tadbeer se banaiye maiyare zndagi..
maahaul se hayat ka sauda na kijiye...
"muflisi ka hamne apni kuch is tarah rakha bharam..
.waste kam ker diye maghroor kehlane lage..."RAKHTI HAI....... "...................................................................................................................................................................................................
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
की इस शहर दौड में दौड के करना क्या है?अगर यही जीना हैं दोस्तों... तो फिर मरना क्या हैं?पहली बारिश में ट्रेन लेट होने की फ़िकर हैं......भूल गये भींगते हुए टहलना क्या हैं.......सीरियल के सारे किरदारो के हाल हैं मालुम......पर माँ का हाल पूछ्ने की फ़ुरसत कहाँ हैं!!!!!!अब रेत पर नंगे पैर टहलते क्यों नहीं........१०८ चैनल हैं पर दिल बहलते क्यों नहीं!!!!!!!इंटरनेट पे सारी दुनिया से तो टच में हैं.......लेकिन पडोस में कौन रहता हैं जानते तक नहीं!!!!मोबाईल, लैंडलाईन सब की भरमार हैं.........लेकिन ज़िगरी दोस्त तक पहुंचे ऐसे तार कहाँ हैं!!!!कब डूबते हुए सूरज को देखा था याद हैं??????कब जाना था वो शाम का गुजरना क्या हैं!!!!!!!तो दोस्तो इस शहर की दौड में दौड के करना क्या हैं??????अगर यही जीना हैं तो फिर मरना क्या हैं!!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)